I am writing this letter on behalf of the thousands of men and women who are currently incarcerated within the PA DOC. The advertisement I read said the purpose of your website was to re-evaluate the direction of the PA DOC. I would say it is pretty obvious that it is all about warehousing inmates. If it weren’t then they would be doing something more to release those who have completed the recommended programs and who have remained free of misconduct. Currently, the DOC rarely gives their support for parole. That is because the actions of a few parolees who were released and then committed very hanous acts (such as killing police officers). Governor Rendell oversteps his bounds and puts a hold on people being paroled. Now everyone is being forced to pay the price.

It is not longer only affecting the state system; it has now hit the county system. Because the state system is so overcrowded and cannot accept more than a few commitments at a time, the county jails are being forced to hold state inmates longer, which is leading to such overcrowding that the counties are having to send their inmates to other counties and also out of state to serve their time. It is not solely the DOC’s fault though. The state parole system is largely to blame as well. There are currently thousands of inmates in state prisons who were re-incarcerated due to non-violent parole violations.

The vast majority of parole violators are here because of drug use, including the possession of small amounts of drugs (for personal use) or DUIs. For the people who do not have an extensive list of these charges from the past, it would benefit the individual and the tax paying community far more if the parole system were to enact rules that would require these people to enroll in inpatient treatment for their first offense. Not to mention how greatly it would benefit loved ones and dependents of the parolee. It costs less for 90 days of inpatient treatment than it does to house these inmates in prison for the lengths of time they are being housed currently.

The point is that the parole system has plenty of ways to address these kinds of issues rather than automatically sending these people back to prison. Those who do receive inpatient treatment and continue to use drugs and alcohol should be returned to prison for a set amount of time. Currently, even after the parole department stipulates an amount of “back time” for a parole violator, they continuously deny reparole at a high rate. If they set an amount of back time, state required programming and conduct behavior, they should let these people out at their next review. This is not happening. That alone would ease the overcrowding in both the state and county systems and require a smaller budget for the DOC.

Why is it that no one is willing to contact the local newspapers and television news stations to get this information out to the public? It seems to me that adversary and reform groups are far more interested in arguing between themselves about what needs to be addressed first rather than standing together and addressing these issues. People need to realize that there are far more inmates that are not “lifers” and are doing significant amounts of time and I would rather see something other than lifers problems being addressed. In January, Jeffery A. Beard stated before a Justice Committee that we fully understand that simply warehousing inmates will do nothing to ease the violence in the future. Yet that is pretty much all that is being done and those who are completing recommended the programs are being accused of playing the system. How do you play the system when the people making the decision of whether or not to parole a person never speaks with you for even 5 minutes? Sounds to me like the inmates are the ones that are actually being played to think that they have a chance of being paroled. Other states have much higher parole rates and they pretty much automatically parole the inmate as long as they stay out of trouble and complete their programs. I can only hope something I have said will do some good in helping people to understand the true problems that exist within our so called Corrections System.    

Thank you,
Burdette “BUD” Guy Thomas III #GD0191
SCI-Forest, Marienville, PA.

No votes yet